Universal Audio - Dream ‘65

AlbertC Frets: 1025

29 Jun, 2022

I record exclusively at home and because of noise limitations, I can’t mic an amp. Instead I’ve been using a Strymon Iridium for the last two years and occasionally an HX Stomp for DI recording. I like the Iridium’s simplicity and generally prefer the sound of it to the Stomp. Both units are very useable but I’ve never been totally satisfied with either in terms of getting a really convincing amp tone.

Having read about and watched some demoes of UA’s 3 new amp-sim pedals, I was intrigued enough to give one a go, so I ordered the Dream ’65.

I've been using the pedal for about a week now, I’m really impressed with how it sounds. I’ve never played through an actual Fender Deluxe Reverb so I can’t tell you if it accurately emulates one but regardless of this, the Dream ‘65 does produce a fabulous tone. To my ears, it definitely does a better job of sounding and feeling like a proper amp than either the Iridium or Stomp.

The Iridium with its three amps and particularly the Stomp give you a lot more in terms of options, but for me, it’s all about getting the best convincing tone and this is where the UA is outstanding. For what I do, I don’t need 100s of different amp types. I just want one really good amp tone that works for me in most circumstances - the same as for people who just own one real amp.

The Dream ’65 is not without some flexibility though – it has 3 different speaker options (plus a further 3 which can be added via an app) and there are also 3 “amp variations”, so you can tweak the tone. It also has a good sounding reverb, although the adjustment of this is limited to a single amount knob. It also has a very usable tremolo, though this is oddly not available in one of the amp variations.

Another plus is that it also takes pedals really well.

Cons - The lack of headphone socket. Not a deal-breaker as it’s hooked up to my audio interface 99% of the time but the option to use it as a portable, personal amp option would’ve been nice.
Rather meanly, it doesn't come with a power supply - the manual says it requires 400mA of current. However, it did seem to run fine on the 250mA output of my Voodoo Labs Plus 2 though I've now upgraded to an all 500mA power supply anyway. Also it doesn't come with the usb lead you need if you want to update the firmware.

I can’t speak for the more expensive options of amp-sim such as Kemperer and Fractal, but as a mid-range priced option for DI recording, the UA seems like the best way to go, just as long as multiple amp/cab variations and lots of FX aren’t what you need. I’ve already put my Iridium up for sale, though I’ll continue to use my Stomp just for its FX.

LOL

Wow!

Wisdom

Comments

Littlejonny Frets: 224

18 Aug, 2022

Thanks for the review - seriously considering one of these. Looking to go fully digital/solid state soon, so this is top of my list to try.

LOL

Wow!

Wisdom

joeW Frets: 627

18 Aug, 2022

Thanks for the review @AlbertC - the online reviews have been so positive that I was hoping for a trusted user review. I am certainly considering one of these

LOL

Wow!

Wisdom

melod Frets: 136

04 Jan, 2023

Old thread but was wondering if more can weigh in with their experience on the UA sim pedals.

LOL

Wow!

Wisdom

birtner Frets: 76

20 May, 2024

I have the Lion 68 and Woodrow. They are decent, sound as good as any other amp sim (if not better) and are simple to use.

They suffer from a headroom issue it seems in that if you want a solo boost and juice it was another pedal it just makes the sound thicker. From my very limited experience this is the same as other amp sims. The preset button allows you to set a solo boost and is super easy to set up. In a way it forces you to use the whole pedal.

Other than that I use mine like a normal amp - set to dirty and then clean up with volume. Sounds good through a full PA with the band and, whilst I miss valves, the sound is consistent so less faffing around.

LOL

Wow!

Wisdom